Newsletter: Volume
2, 2008
Vol. 1,
2008:
What to Look for with
Excess Deposit Insurance
Vol. 3,
2007:
How Do You Handle a
Whistleblower?
Vol. 2,
2007:
Remote Deposit
Capture
Vol. 1,
2007:
E-mail asking for
assistance
Vol. 5,
2006:
Correspondent
Bank
Accounts
Vol. 4,
2006:
BancInsure
announces
streamlined renewal
process
Vol. 3,
2006:
Trust Department
Errors & Omissions
Vol. 2,
2006:
Identity Theft Prevention
Vol. 1,
2006:
Fraudulent Canadian
Checks Alert
Sign up
To receive regular
newsletters, enter your information below.
|
Overlooked,
Misunderstood and Often Uncovered
the Fiduciary Liability Exposure
by Tom Havens, Director of Marketing Services
Section 409 of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) reads, in part:
“Any person who is a fiduciary
with respect to a plan who breaches any of the
responsibilities, obligations and duties imposed upon
fiduciaries by this title, shall be personally liable
to make good to such plan resulting from each such breach,
….”.
The
scope of ERISA is broad. With some limited exceptions, most
employee benefit plans fall under ERISA control. The types of
plans covered by ERISA are divided in two general groups,
employee benefit pension plans and employee benefit welfare
plans.
Employee benefit pension plans
essentially means any plan that provides retirement benefits to
employees (pension or profit sharing) or, a plan that defers
income for employees to periods after termination of employment.
Less understood is ERISA’s breadth as respects employee
benefit welfare plans which include medical, accident,
disability, death, unemployment, hospital care, training or
various other employee welfare plans.
Although ERISA legislation does not
require the establishment of any benefit plans nor does it
mandate the procurement of liability insurance, if a bank does
decide to establish a pension or welfare plan for their
employees, ERISA prescribes certain strict standards of conduct
for those who control those funds and manage those plans.
ERISA is clear in demanding
personal responsibility for those persons defined as
“fiduciaries.” A community bank’s plan administrators,
trustees, and fiduciaries must take care to see that their
fiduciary responsibilities are carried out properly.
Carelessness in the investment of plan assets, for example, can
open the door to personal financial disaster for these
individuals.
Who is a Fiduciary?
Anyone who exercises discretionary authority or control over
plan management or plan assets; anyone with discretionary
authority or responsibility in administration of a plan; anyone
who provides investment advice to a plan for compensation.
Their basic duty is to “discharge his or her duties with
respect to a plan solely in the interest of the participants and
beneficiaries.”
Who could be a fiduciary?
Your community bank’s Human Resource Director; Chief Financial
Officer; members of the plan’s investment committee; persons who
select the investment committee; persons who have authority and
responsibility in the functioning of the plan, regardless of
their formal title. The key to determination is what that person
does or has the right to do with respect to the plan. If a
person has discretionary control over the plan or its assets,
then that person is likely a fiduciary. The person’s conduct
will then be judged according to ERISA’s strict fiduciary
standards.
What are some typical claim
scenarios that might give rise to fiduciary liability?
-
Participants sue their bank
employer, claiming that the employer attempted to prevent
them from obtaining benefits under the plan. Such claims may
arise in the context of a layoff or other discharge from
employment, which the employee asserts was motivated by the
employer’s desire to avoid paying pension or other benefits.
-
Participants sue on the ground
that plan assets have performed poorly, due to alleged
mismanagement by trustees, investment advisors, or others
with control over assets.
-
The bank’s trustees or
investment advisors are accused of insufficient
diversification of plan assets, that those investments are
underperforming.
-
The bank’s self-directed 401(k)
plan offers too few fund choices, or funds that only offer
lower overall returns with high administrative expenses.
-
You make a decision to change
medical plan carriers and an employee loses a critical
cancer benefit. That employee in turn sues the bank and plan
fiduciaries alleging negligence in the failure to review
that decision’s impact upon its employees.
-
You offer an ESOP for your bank
employees. The asset value of the ESOP drops significantly.
The participants sue the fiduciaries of the ESOP alleging
that the ESOP paid too high a price for the shares sold to
the ESOP and mismanaged the company’s performance,
contributing to the drop in asset value.
-
Disability plan benefits are
denied by the plan based on disputed evidence regarding the
fact or extent of the participant’s disability.
-
Fiduciaries are alleged to have
dealt with plan assets in circumstances where a conflict of
interest exists (e.g. self-dealing or dealing with a related
person or entity).
Why is the purchase of Fiduciary
Liability coverage oftentimes overlooked during a bank’s
professional liability coverage review?
One of the most common
misconceptions is that a bank’s Directors & Officers Liability
policy automatically covers the fiduciary liability exposure.
Actually, all ERISA liability is generally excluded by most D&O
insurance policies.
Another misunderstanding is that
the purchase of Employee Benefit Liability (EBL) coverage alone,
usually obtained as an endorsement to the bank’s general
liability policy, will provide all the necessary insurance
protection for a bank’s fiduciaries.
While EBL coverage is indeed
valuable, it only provides part of the solution. Bank
employees who provide benefits counseling to employees,
interpret benefits, handle records and other “administrative”
tasks while engaged in these ministerial functions within
guidelines established by others are probably not considered
fiduciaries. The rationale is that with the possible exception
of improper counseling and benefits interpretation, many of
these types of mistakes are minor in nature and can usually be
corrected once identified. Those individuals “would” likely be
afforded necessary insurance protection provided by the EBL
coverage endorsement.
However, EBL coverage alone does
not cover “judgmental” errors or prohibited acts, nor address
the broader personal liability exposures faced by a bank’s
fiduciaries. The good news is that most Fiduciary Liability
Insurance policies incorporate not only employee benefit
liability coverage but also personal liability protection for
fiduciaries under their respective contracts.
Finally, another reason often cited
for not purchasing Fiduciary Liability coverage is that a bank
often only offers self-directed 401(k) plans. It is important to
note that 401(k) plan liability can arise, albeit less often,
even where the bank employer only offers a self-directed 401(k)
option.
What if the employer is unable to
offer enough investment fund choices to its employees? What if
the fund choices offered by the bank deliver lower than expected
overall returns? What if employees are paying high expenses,
usually borne by the employees, to administer the plan? Even if
an employer hires a professional firm to run the bank’s 401(k)
plan, someone at the bank has selected that particular firm and
will likely share at least some co-fiduciary liability.
Increased litigation in this seemingly exposure-free area
indicates a growing sophistication and awareness of required
employer responsibility to employees of 401(k) plan performance.
Can fiduciary responsibility be
delegated and/or mitigated?
As mentioned in the previous
paragraph, as respects a self-directed 401(k) plan, a fiduciary
may delegate his or her responsibility by appointing a qualified
investment manager to manage all or part of the plan assets. The
named fiduciary would not be liable for the acts of the
investment manager as long as he or she acts prudently in
choosing and retaining the investment manager. However, a
fiduciary is not relieved of his/her responsibility
merely because he or she follows the advice of an investment
advisor- see Section 405 of the ERISA Act.
Such delegation must be permitted
by the terms of the plan document and implemented in a prudent
manner . However if a delegating fiduciary knows, or should
know, that the delegated duties are not being carried out
appropriately, he or she may be liable. Delegation or allocation
of fiduciary duties also does not entirely relieve the fiduciary
of all liability since the delegating fiduciary will always
remain subject to co-fiduciary rules and responsibilities.
Does fiduciary responsibility
insurance offer the best solution?
ERISA permits the plan to insure
itself or its fiduciaries for loss on account of fiduciary acts
or omissions.
Most such insurance protection
protects the assets of the plan from depletion caused by
mismanagement, reimburses the organization if they have to pay
for administrative mistakes (EBL), pays the cost of legal
defense, and protects the personal liability of fiduciaries.
It is important to note that
several major industry studies have concluded that defense cost
coverage alone is sufficient enough reason to consider buying
this coverage. We live in a litigious society, and despite your
bank’s fiduciaries acting like prudent experts in accordance
with the rules of ERISA, there are bound to be lawsuits and the
decision maker/fiduciary should assume a worst case scenario.
The above article illustrates the
need for a careful review of your D&O/Professional Liability
program in order to eliminate this major gap in coverage. Make
sure that your community bank itself (the entity) is included in
any coverage you procure as, not surprisingly, most lawsuits
will typically include all deep pockets. This is relatively
inexpensive protection, so make sure your BancInsure advisor or
independent agent carefully checks your policy during any
professional liability review.
BancInsure
now offers a Single Policy Solution to protect the assets
of your community bank and those of your directors and officers.
Introducing our new Extended Professional Liability Insurance
Policy. Under one integrated policy, we offer an expansive
selection of management, e-commerce and professional liability
choices with the flexibility to select only the coverages your
institution requires. It’s your choice:
ยท
Executive
Liability
ยท
Company
Reimbursement
ยท
Company
Professional Liability
ยท
Company
Lender Liability
ยท
Company
Securities Liability
ยท
Employment Practices Liability
ยท
Fiduciary
Liability
ยท
Trust
Department Liability
ยท
Electronic Banking Liability
ยท
Electronic Publishing Liability
ยท
Harassment of Third Parties Liability – New!
ยท
Public
Relations Expenses – New!
ยท
Customer
Privacy Expenses – New!
ยท
Investigative Expenses – New!
If you would
like to find out more about this Extended Professional Liability
Insurance Policy, contact your local BancInsure Territory Sales
Manager, independent agent or visit us at
www.bancinsure.com for more information.
BancInsure Announces
Chief Underwriting Officer
Oklahoma
City, OK- The Board of Directors for BMSI Holdings,
Inc, the parent company of the insurer BancInsure, Inc,
announced today that Bruce Livingston has been promoted to Vice
President and Chief Underwriting Officer of The Companies.
“This leader brings a depth of
underwriting and insurance experience that is essential for our
operations,” said Rodney N. Sargent, President and CEO of The
Companies. “His strategic insights into product and program
development, coupled with his executive leadership acumen,
reflect the growing bench strength of our leadership team.”
Mr. Livingston comes to BancInsure
with 24 years of executive experience in underwriting
leadership, program development, and operational oversight.
Prior to BancInsure, Mr. Livingston led product management and
development for Harleysville Insurance Company in Pennsylvania
and was an officer of the company. He was a former Division
President of Professional Underwriters Corporation (a subsidiary
of Legion Management Corporation) where he served as Chief
Executive Officer for this underwriting services company
handling program premium in excess of $150M. Bruce started his
career at Crum & Forster Commercial Insurance Company where he
held a variety of roles.
A graduate of Texas Tech
University, Bruce holds a BA in Business Administration. He
holds the Chartered Property and Casualty Underwriter (CPCU) and
Associate in Claims (AIC) designations. Prior to Bruce’s
relocation from Pennsylvania to Oklahoma, he was an active
member of the Greater Valley Forge Chapter of CPCU.
Founded in 1985 as the only truly
independent insurer focusing completely on financial
institutions, BancInsure's understanding of financial
institutions and their intricate operations is unmatched in the
marketplace. This translates to extraordinary value through
complete risk mitigation and risk management solutions.
Headquartered in Oklahoma City, BancInsure holds an A-
(Excellent) A.M. Best rating and is licensed in 48 states.
|